1 John 4:3 says the anti-christ is already in the world and this means the anti-christ rose to power during the New Testament. Based on the description of the governing of the anti-christ it was present long before the New Testament but reappeared during the rise of Rome. The book of Matthew 21:12-17, Jesus turned over the table due to the deceitful practices of the money changers and this text is also evidence that the anti-christ was present in the New testament because corruption of religious institutions is evidence of the rise of the anti-christ.
The Roman oppression consisted of soldiers, police of sorts monitoring the native people, forced labor, slavery, hunger, injustice, and inequality. Many of the people in Judea lost their freedom and all of the aforementioned acts are also evidence of the presence of the anti-christ. John the Baptist was executed by beheading, Jesus and the theives were given the death sentence for minor crimes; all of these cruel acts are evidence of the presence of the anti-christ. But did these acts of the anti-christ come from Rome or through the temple or did they work together
Many of the natural laws of Africa and Asia were uprooted and replaced laws such the selling of people and forced labor which includes exilments. When ever this type of governance is present it is a sign of the rise of the anti-christ which can be seen in as far back as Genesis chapter 2 yet modern theology teaches that the anti-christ is yet to come. Where did this theory originate?
As we read the bible and history we can see the translators removed books from the bible that were associated to the rule of Alexander the Great, and his military officers, the Ptolemies (the family of Cleopatra) and the Selucids in Asia and Canaan. The New Testament begins with the events in the following books.
The book of Matthew begins with the birth of Jesus
The book of Mark begins with the appearance of John the Baptist
The book of Luke begins with the conception of John the baptist
The book of John begins with the birth of John the baptist 1:19
The writers of these books have given us a timeline but in order to get the dates. I suggest using Matthew chapter 1 verse 1 to verse 17 to determine what year the events in the books of the new testament took place and you can do that by determining who the ruler was during the chapters in these letters (books)
Based on history the new testament begins with the King Herod who was appointed by what is called the triumvirate that includes Mark Anthony, Octavian and lepidus.
At the beginning of the gospels the Roman ruler Octavian was the ruler . The only historical event that is in line with the births of John the baptist and Jesus of Nazaraeth is Octavian who became the consul between the years 5bc and 2bc.
The year current year represents the beginning of the rule Octavian as the Augustus and the Horus , the Christ of ancient Rome and its provinces. Though we were told that AD represents the birth of Jesus please consider AD to represent the appoinement of the Roman Christ ,Augustus.
during this period Rome transitioned from a Republic to a Empire with one sole decider Octavian)
In order for Augustus to become the first Pharoah of Roman descent he would need to be appointed by a highpriest of Africa, just as the family of Cleopatra had to be appointed to rule by an order of priest. The names Cleopatra and August are evidence that they were appointed to govern the Nile civilization because just like Augustus was given a name of an ancient African God , the Horus Cleopatras name includes the symbols of an ancient African trinity Asa alah pata and ra. Conquerors would attempt to erase her name from history and it is more than likely that she was a priestess of Isis and thus her name would reflect the priest that appoineted her.
We have established that the current year represemts the 3rd millennium and the rule of Augustus but how did this rule change the order of the ancient world and was it the anti-christ? Lets keep in mind that Julius Ceasar is not mentioned in the Acts 1:6. The word kingdom in this text is defined as sovereignity one of the meanings of soveignty is independent rule. According to history Judea was independent for 100 years after they revolted against the Selucids one of Alexander the Greats military rulers who was given a portion of Asia to rule.
What was Cleopatras relationship with Judea ( It appears the military of Alexandar fought each other for the territory called the Levant which included Judea).
How did the Selucids conquer Judea ( Apparently there were periods when the Selucids and the Ptolomys were fighting against each other) When the Selucids conquered Judea they apparently began to interfere with the way they worship and the Maccabees fought against them.
This may have been a period of the rise of the Anti-Christ there for it seems Cleopatra did not rule as an antichrist.
What was Herods relationship wtth the selucids
Herods was appointed by Marc Anthony and he was a part of a Roman triumvirate which is seems to be associated with a word from Hindu the Trimurti.
Both words include the similar ancient symbols. The Trimurti includes the
Brhama - Creator
Vishnu - Preserver
Siva or Shiva- Destroyer
Triumvirate
Julius Ceasar - Orator -Politician/Military
Pompey -Military/
Crassus - Financial power/business
second Triumvirate
Octavian - Political strategust
Anthony - Military ( General) killed in a cival war with Octavian
Lepidus - political figure and military commander (forced into exile)
